Longevity: Exploring the Science of a Longer, Healthier Life

Lifestyle Choices: Navigating the Hazards to Longevity

As the new year begins, many are inspired to take bold steps towards better health. January, especially, sees a surge in gym attendance. To channel this momentum, I delve into harmful substances and practices that could shorten one's lifespan. While some, like smoking, are widely recognized, others may surprise you yet are equally deserving of attention. This chapter relies on scholarly and peer-reviewed sources to outline what to avoid for a longer, healthier life. To begin, let’s start with smoking.  

1. Tobacco Smoking and Its Impacts on Health

Despite a decline due to vigorous public health campaigns, smoking remains all too common, from my perspective as a healthcare provider. Smoking tobacco is one of the most preventable causes of death and disease yet continues to be a widespread habit globally. The detrimental effects of smoking are extensive, impacting nearly every organ system. Below, we explore how smoking exacerbates the risk for specific cancers and other serious health conditions, emphasizing the severity of these risks through risk ratios from reputable medical sources.

  • Heart Disease: Smokers have a dramatically increased risk of heart disease, with studies showing they are 2 to 4 times more likely to develop coronary heart disease than non-smokers (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023).

  • Chronic Bronchitis: Part of the broader category of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic bronchitis involves long-term inflammation of the bronchi, the major air passages to the lungs. It leads to persistent coughing with mucus, wheezing, and a feeling of tightness in the chest. Regular vaping can irritate the airways and lead to or exacerbate this condition, especially in adolescents. Smoking accounts for approximately 80% of COPD deaths. The risk of developing this debilitating respiratory condition is significantly higher in smokers, highlighting the deadly impact of tobacco on lung health (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023).

  • Lung Cancer: The most alarming statistic is related to lung cancer, where smokers face about a 25 times higher risk than non-smokers. This positions smoking as the primary cause of lung cancer, responsible for the majority of cases (American Cancer Society, n.d.).

  • Pancreatic Cancer: Smoking doubles the risk of developing pancreatic cancer, a particularly lethal cancer often diagnosed in its late stages, with smoking significantly increasing its prevalence (National Cancer Institute, n.d.).

  • Breast Cancer: Although the link between smoking and breast cancer is not as pronounced as with other cancers, evidence suggests that long-term smoking may slightly increase the risk of this disease (Susan G. Komen®, 2023).

Cancer Risk Summary:

  1. Lung Cancer (RR: ~25x)

  2. Laryngeal Cancer (RR: ~10-20x)

  3. Esophageal Cancer (RR: ~5-10x)

  4. Bladder Cancer (RR: ~3x)

  5. Kidney Cancer (RR: ~1.5-2x)

  6. Pancreatic Cancer (RR: ~2x)

  7. Stomach Cancer (RR: ~1.5-2x)

  8. Cervical Cancer (RR: ~1.5x)

  9. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (RR: ~1.5x)

Conclusion: The evidence is clear—smoking is a formidable risk factor for a range of life-threatening diseases, especially cancers. Quitting smoking, or ideally never starting, is the best defense against these risks and is essential for better health. If you are exercising, eating healthily, and generally doing everything right, yet still smoking, it’s akin to driving to work with your handbrake engaged or trying to sail with your anchor down. In short, it’s worth quitting, even if it means simply reducing the number of cigarettes you smoke each day.

2. The New Smoking: Vaping (E-Cigarettes)

While electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have gained popularity as alternatives to traditional smoking, misconceptions persist about their safety. Compared to the extensive data available on traditional smoking, the research on e-cigarettes is relatively nascent. However, emerging evidence strongly suggests that vaping devices carry significant health risks.

Respiratory Health Risks: Vaping has been linked to various lung injuries, such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, lipoid pneumonia, and acute eosinophilic pneumonia, which can lead to severe respiratory distress and even be fatal (Henry et al., 2020). Additionally, vaping (like smoking) has been associated with an increased risk of chronic bronchitis symptoms, particularly among adolescents (McConnell et al., 2017).

·         Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: This condition is essentially an allergic reaction in the lungs. It occurs when the lungs develop inflammation due to an allergic response to inhaled particles, including dust or, in the case of vaping, certain chemical components. Symptoms might include coughing, difficulty breathing, and fevers, especially following exposure.

·         Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage: This is a serious condition where bleeding occurs in the alveoli, the tiny air sacs in the lungs where oxygen is exchanged for carbon dioxide in the blood. This can lead to coughing up blood, severe difficulty breathing, and can be life-threatening if not treated promptly.

·         Lipoid Pneumonia: Unlike typical pneumonia, which is usually caused by infection, lipoid pneumonia occurs when fatty substances enter the lungs, leading to inflammation. Vaping oils and other substances can cause this type of pneumonia if they are inhaled deeply into the lungs.

 

·         Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia: This condition involves a rapid accumulation of eosinophils, a type of white blood cell, in the lungs. It's often a reaction to drugs, toxins, or infections and can cause fever, difficulty breathing, and fatigue. Vaping has been implicated in triggering this immune response.

These are serious conditions that that can be life threatening in many cases. During my internal medicine residency days, I encountered several cases of lipoid pneumonia and hypersensitivity pneumonitis—both conditions linked to vaping. The following case reports are examples that were available to me from publicly available news reports. One notable case reported involved a young woman who, after vaping, presented with progressive symptoms such as dyspnea, cough, and fever. Her diagnosis was confirmed through imaging that showed diffuse ground-glass infiltrates, and she required intensive care for respiratory failure (Viswam et al., 2018). Another case involved a 28-year-old man who developed acute respiratory failure after using a THC-containing vape cartridge, with bronchoalveolar lavage confirming lipoid pneumonia (Dicpinigaitis et al., 2020). I was not directly involved in either of these cases and only summarized the case reports from the publicly available news articles.

These instances highlight the severe potential of vaping-associated respiratory illnesses, emphasizing the need for increased clinical awareness and careful review of a patient's vaping history when presenting with unexplained respiratory symptoms.

Cardiovascular Effects: Nicotine exposure from vaping can increase heart rate and blood pressure, thus contributing to cardiovascular stress. Research indicates that vaping may increase the risk of myocardial infarction (Benowitz & Burbank, 2016).

Neurological Impact: Nicotine is notoriously addictive and can severely impair adolescent brain development, affecting critical cognitive functions such as attention, learning, and impulse control (England et al., 2017).

Chemical Exposure Risks: E-cigarette aerosols contain harmful substances, including heavy metals like lead, volatile organic compounds, and carcinogens. Exposure to these toxins can cause cellular damage and elevate the risk of chronic diseases (Williams et al., 2013).

Addiction and Gateway Effect: There is concern that e-cigarette use among adolescents may lead to traditional cigarette smoking, due to the addictive nature of nicotine and the ease of transition from vaping to smoking (Soneji et al., 2017).

Conclusion: Although often marketed as safer alternatives to cigarettes, e-cigarettes pose considerable health risks. The full extent of the long-term effects of vaping remains unknown, and further research is crucial. Based on what I have witnessed and the current evidence, I strongly advise against the use of e-cigarettes. I believe that, like smoking, the detrimental effects of vaping will become increasingly clear over time. It is prudent to avoid being part of the statistics on vaping-related harm.

3. The Bitter Truth About Refined Sugars

Refined sugars, pervasive in modern diets, are implicated in numerous health issues, from metabolic disorders to chronic inflammation. I know this is probably not the best time of the year to bring my readers attention to this but refined sugars are bad news for our health. Nonetheless, for health enthusiasts seeking to optimize wellness, understanding the impact of refined sugars is crucial to help with moderating sugar consumption or eliminating it altogether.

  • Metabolic Health: Excessive consumption of refined sugars can lead to weight gain and obesity, primarily because these sugars are often consumed in forms that do not provide satiety and are thus easy to overconsume. Studies have shown that high sugar intake significantly increases the risk of developing metabolic syndrome, a cluster of conditions that raise the risk of heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes (Stanhope, 2016). These conditions include increased blood pressure, high blood sugar levels, excess body fat around the waist, and abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels. Essentially, having metabolic syndrome means you have several factors at the same time that put your health at greater risk, especially for serious cardiovascular diseases.

  • Increased Cancer Risk: Moreover, refined sugars have been implicated in an increased risk of various cancers. High sugar intake is associated with an elevated risk of developing cancers such as breast and colon cancer, due to its effects on body weight, inflammation, and hormone regulation. These findings highlight the potential carcinogenic impact of excessive sugar consumption ( Epner et al, 2022)

  • Inflammatory Responses: Refined sugars trigger inflammation in the body. Chronic inflammation is linked to an array of conditions, including heart disease, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases. The process involves rapid spikes in blood sugar and insulin levels, which lead to an increase in inflammatory markers (Rippe & Angelopoulos, 2016).

  • Impact on the Gut Microbiome: Consuming high amounts of refined sugars can disrupt the balance of gut microbiota, leading to dysbiosis. This imbalance can affect everything from digestion to immune function, and may even influence mood and behavior (Schmidt et al., 2018).

  • Dental Health: Sugars are well-known contributors to dental problems. They serve as a food source for bacteria in the mouth, which produce acids that lead to tooth decay. Limiting sugar intake is a primary recommendation for the prevention of dental caries (Moynihan & Kelly, 2014).

  • Behavioral and Cognitive Effects: There is growing evidence to suggest that high sugar consumption may impact cognitive function and could contribute to mood disorders. Sugars influence brain function by affecting neurotransmitters that regulate mood and stress (Francis & Stevenson, 2013).

Summary of Key Risks Linked to Refined Sugars:

  • Obesity and metabolic syndrome

  • Increased cancer risk

  • Systemic inflammation

  • Gut microbiome dysbiosis

  • Dental health deterioration

  • Cognitive and behavioral changes

Conclusion: Refined sugars, while ubiquitous in processed foods, present significant health risks. Reducing their intake can lead to better health outcomes across a spectrum of conditions. Awareness and education about the hidden sugars in foods can empower individuals to make healthier dietary choices.

4. Prescription Opioids: A Gateway to the Opioid Crisis

The opioid crisis in the United States is a profound public health tragedy, with prescription opioids serving as a critical catalyst. Originally intended to manage pain, these medications have instead paved a path to addiction and widespread misuse.

  • Prescription Opioids and Overdose Deaths: Prescription opioids such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, and methadone have been linked to a significant number of overdose deaths. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that in 2017 alone, over 17,000 deaths were attributed to overdoses involving prescription opioids (CDC, 2018).

  • Transition to Illicit Opioids: Research has shown that prescription opioid misuse often leads to the use of more accessible and potent illicit opioids like heroin and fentanyl. A study found that approximately 4% to 6% of those who misuse prescription opioids transition to heroin, highlighting a direct pathway from legal to illegal opioid use (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2020).

  • Regulatory and Pharmaceutical Missteps: The escalation of the opioid crisis has been fueled by both the aggressive marketing tactics of pharmaceutical companies and the lack of stringent regulatory oversight. Purdue Pharma, for instance, aggressively marketed OxyContin in the late 1990s, downplaying its addiction risk, which significantly contributed to its widespread misuse (Van Zee, 2009).

The Fentanyl Crisis: An Illicit Evolution

Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid up to 50 times stronger than heroin, has become the deadliest drug in the opioid epidemic. Its potency and relatively low cost have made it a popular adulterant in other drugs, often unbeknownst to the user, leading to a significant rise in fatalities.

  • Potency and Overdose Risk: Fentanyl's extreme potency means that even a small dose can be lethal. The CDC has reported that synthetic opioids, including fentanyl, are now the most common drugs involved in drug overdose deaths in the United States, with over 31,000 deaths in 2018 alone (CDC, 2019).

  • Illicit Market and Accessibility: The accessibility of fentanyl through illicit drug markets has exacerbated its impact. It is often mixed with heroin or counterfeit pills mimicking prescription opioids, which increases the overdose risk for users unaware of the fentanyl content (DEA, 2021).

Conclusion:

The trajectory of the opioid crisis from prescription misuse to the infiltration of illicit fentanyl in drug markets represents a significant public health challenge. Addressing this crisis requires comprehensive strategies that include tighter prescription controls, better patient education on the risks of opioid use, and stronger measures against the illicit drug trade.

6. The Impact of Non-Opioid Drugs

While opioids have captured much of the public's attention due to the ongoing crisis, non-opioid drugs also pose significant risks and contribute to public health challenges. Here, we explore the adverse effects of widely abused non-opioid substances such as cocaine, methamphetamine, cannabis, and kratom.

  • Cocaine: Cocaine use can lead to severe cardiovascular issues, including heart attacks and strokes, even in otherwise healthy individuals. The drug causes a temporary spike in blood pressure, which can precipitate these events. Studies have shown that chronic use can also lead to addictive behaviors and severe mental health disorders like anxiety and paranoia (Volkow et al., 2016).

  • Methamphetamine: Often referred to as meth, this drug has a high potential for addiction and can cause devastating health effects. It is associated with severe dental problems ("meth mouth"), skin sores, and increased risk of infectious diseases due to compromised personal hygiene and risky behaviors. Long-term use can lead to significant cognitive deficits, impacting memory and executive function (Hart et al., 2012).

  • Cannabis: While often perceived as less harmful, cannabis use is not without risks. Chronic use, particularly in young people, can be associated with altered brain development, potential reduction in IQ, and increased risk of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. Additionally, there is a potential for dependency, characterized by the inability to stop using despite negative personal and professional consequences (Volkow et al., 2014).

  • Kratom: Kratom is a plant-based substance primarily used for its psychoactive properties in pain relief, mood enhancement, and as an aid in opioid withdrawal. However, its legality and safety are contentious. Studies have highlighted potential negative effects, including dependency, withdrawal symptoms, and rare but serious health outcomes such as liver damage and cardiovascular issues. The FDA has issued warnings about the toxic and addictive nature of kratom, citing numerous cases of harm and death associated with its use (Post et al., 2018).

Summary of Key Risks Linked to Non-Opioid Drugs:

  • Cardiovascular diseases from stimulants like cocaine.

  • Neurological and cognitive impairments from stimulants like methamphetamine.

  • Psychiatric disorders and dependency from cannabinoids.

  • Dependency and potential severe health complications from kratom.

Conclusion: The health consequences of non-opioid illicit drugs are profound and multifaceted. Public health interventions should not only focus on treating and preventing opioid abuse but also extend to addressing the wide spectrum of substance abuse disorders. Education on the dangers of these substances and access to treatment are critical components of a comprehensive public health strategy.

7.       Another big contributor to preventable deaths in the USA is gun violence

Gun violence in the United States is a complex and pervasive issue that extends far beyond the high-profile mass shootings that often dominate headlines. This violence takes various forms, each contributing to a substantial public health burden.

  • Scope of Gun Violence: In the United States, firearm-related injuries and deaths are alarmingly high, with over 45,000 fatalities reported in 2020, making it one of the leading causes of preventable deaths (NIHCM, 2021). This number includes homicides, suicides, and accidental shootings.

  • Mass Shootings vs. Daily Gun Violence: While mass shootings represent a visible and shocking form of gun violence, they account for a small percentage of total gun-related deaths. Daily gun violence, which includes homicides, suicides, and unintentional discharges, consistently affects communities and poses long-term public health challenges (Pew Research Center, 2022).

  • Suicide: Firearms are the most common method used in suicides in the U.S., accounting for over half of all suicide deaths. The ease of access to guns significantly increases the risk of suicide by firearm (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022).

  • Community and Domestic Violence: Firearms exacerbate the lethality of domestic violence situations and are often used in violent crimes within communities, particularly in areas with high rates of poverty and limited access to mental health services (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2021).

  • Racial Disparities: Gun violence disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic communities, where homicide rates are significantly higher compared to white populations. These disparities highlight the intersection of gun violence with social, economic, and racial inequalities (NIHCM, 2021).

Conclusion:

Gun violence in the U.S. is a multifaceted issue that affects various aspects of public life. While mass shootings capture public and media attention, the daily realities of gun-related deaths through suicides, domestic incidents, and community violence reflect a broader and more persistent problem. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive strategies that encompass law enforcement, mental health support, and community-based interventions.

8.       Dosage Maketh Drugs and Poisons: Alcohol

Alcohol consumption presents a complex paradox in public health due to its dual impact on the body. While some studies have touted the cardiovascular benefits of moderate drinking, a more comprehensive look at the research reveals that even moderate alcohol intake can pose significant health risks.

Alcohol: A Double-Edged Sword

While anyone familiar with the positive effects of alcohol on their mood or bodies, it’s often harder to recall the potential harmful effects. When it comes to alcohol, it’s as if all coins are one sided. Just like the nearly 60 year old Mike Tyson found out recently in his fight against 27 year ole Jake Paul, reality has a way of hitting home hard. My hope is to present both sides of alcohol’s effects on health for patient’s to make informed decision based on recently available evidence.

  • Health Risks of Alcohol: Alcohol is a recognized carcinogen associated with an increased risk of multiple cancers, including those of the breast and liver. The Global Burden of Disease Study concludes that no level of alcohol consumption can be considered safe, as alcohol is attributed to nearly 3 million deaths globally each year (Grucza et al., 2018).

  • Cardiovascular Risks: The cardiovascular benefits of alcohol, once promoted as a justification for moderate consumption, are now overshadowed by the risks. Alcohol consumption has been linked to an increased incidence of hypertension, a major risk factor for heart disease. Furthermore, even light drinking is associated with a higher risk of certain cancers and other health issues, challenging the notion that a small amount of alcohol could be harmless (Roerecke & Rehm, 2014).

More recent research continues to underscore the complex and often detrimental effects of alcohol consumption on health. A comprehensive review by Andreasson et al. (2023) highlights alcohol's substantial role in causing hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The report emphasizes that alcohol consumption, even at low levels, significantly contributes to the development of high blood pressure, which in turn increases the risk of heart disease, stroke, and other serious health conditions (Andreason et al, 2023).

·         Two side of a coin study: That’s not really the title of the study but as far as I’m concerned, it fits. A study from Massachusetts General Hospital revealed that while light to moderate alcohol consumption might be associated with reduced cardiovascular disease risks due to lowered stress signaling in the brain, any amount of alcohol consumption increases the risk of cancer. The study also notes that the potential benefits of moderate alcohol consumption on heart health are overshadowed by the increased risk of developing other serious health conditions, including various forms of cancer ( Chase, 2023).

Alcohol and Cognitive Implications

While the cardiovascular effects of alcohol have been extensively studied, its impact on cognitive function is equally critical and concerning. Long-term alcohol consumption, even at moderate levels, can lead to significant cognitive decline and structural brain changes.

  • Neurological Impact: Chronic alcohol use can cause brain atrophy, particularly in regions responsible for memory and executive function. Research has shown that individuals who consume alcohol regularly have a higher rate of brain volume loss compared to those who abstain (Topiwala et al., 2017). This shrinkage is associated with cognitive impairments, including memory loss and difficulty processing complex tasks.

  • Cognitive Decline: Alcohol’s neurotoxic effects can accelerate the onset of cognitive decline. Studies indicate that even moderate drinking is linked to poorer cognitive performance over time. For instance, a study found that moderate alcohol consumption was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of hippocampal atrophy, an area crucial for memory and navigation (Topiwala et al., 2017).

Risk of Dementia: There is also evidence suggesting that heavy and prolonged alcohol use increases the risk of dementia. Alcohol-induced brain damage manifests not only in immediate cognitive impairments but also contributes to long-term degenerative processes that can culminate in dementia (Livingston et al., 2017).

9.       Salt: Essential Yet Overconsumed

Salt, crucial for life, is vital for maintaining fluid balance, nerve transmission, and muscle function. It is often thought as sodium. The main distinction is that salt refers to sodium and other elements such chloride ( ie sodium chloride most commonly in the US). Despite being essential for life, its overconsumption is a significant public health issue due to associated health risks.

Dietary Recommendations and Average Intake:

  • WHO Recommendations: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends consuming less than 5 grams of salt per day, which is approximately equivalent to one teaspoon. The American Heart Association (AHA) takes it even further and recommends no more than 2,300 milligrams of sodium per day, with an ideal limit of no more than 1,500 milligrams per day for most adults (AHA, 2023). These guidelines aim to prevent chronic diseases related to high salt intake, such as hypertension and cardiovascular diseases.

  • Current U.S. Consumption: Despite these recommendations, the average American consumes about 3,400 milligrams of sodium daily, equivalent to about 8.5 grams (nearly 1.7 teaspoons) of salt, which far exceeds even the more laxed WHO's guidelines (CDC, 2024).

Sources of Excessive Salt Intake:

  • Contributing Foods: The primary sources of high salt intake in the U.S. include processed foods, fast foods, and restaurant meals. Common high-sodium items include bread, pizza, cold cuts, canned soups, and snacks like chips and pretzels.

  • Dietary Practices: Frequent consumption of these processed and convenience foods significantly contributes to the overconsumption of salt. Efforts to prepare more meals at home and awareness of sodium content in foods can help manage intake.

Health Risks of High Salt Intake:

  • Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease: High I once had lunch with a friend who asked if wanted him to pass me the salt shaker. I said “No thank you. I try to take it ease with the salt because of my family history of high blood pressure.” He responded with “don’t be such a doctor. I too have a family history of high blood pressure. In fact, I have high blood pressure but that’s why I take my blood pressure meds”. To that I had nothing to say because I didn’t want to spoil his lunch. While I applaud my friend for compliance with blood pressure meds, I could not help to think would need the blood pressure meds if he lowered his salt intake? Even if he still needs meds, would he need the same dose? I don’t know for sure because high blood pressure is rooted in a complex etiology which goes beyond what section is intended to cover. What I’m sure of is that salt intake is directly linked to increases in blood pressure, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Reducing salt intake to recommended levels can significantly lower the risk of developing hypertension and its potential complications (it strokes, heart attacks, kidney disease/failure, and many more).

  • Kidney Disease and Bone Health: Excessive salt consumption can also strain kidney function and increase the risk of kidney stones. Moreover, high salt intake is associated with calcium losses, potentially affecting bone density and leading to osteoporosis.

Public Health Impact:

  • Preventable Deaths: Excess dietary salt is responsible for millions of preventable deaths each year worldwide due to hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Public health initiatives focus on reducing salt consumption through regulations, reformulations by the food industry, and public education about the health risks of high salt intake.

10.       Motor Vehicle Accidents (MVAs): A Preventable Tragedy

Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) remain a significant public health issue in the United States, consistently ranking as one of the leading causes of preventable deaths. The involvement of alcohol and distracted driving, such as using a mobile phone, are major contributing factors to the severity and frequency of these incidents.

  • Driving Under the Influence (DUI): Alcohol-impaired driving is a major risk factor for MVAs. Alcohol involvement is estimated in about 28% of all traffic-related fatalities, highlighting the severe impact of drinking and driving. The impairment caused by alcohol significantly reduces a driver's ability to operate a vehicle safely, affecting reaction times, judgment, and overall motor coordination (CDC, 2020).

  • Distracted Driving: Distracted driving, particularly involving mobile phones, is another critical issue. Despite making up a smaller fraction of total MVAs compared to DUI, distracted driving is responsible for thousands of deaths annually. In 2017 alone, approximately 3,166 fatalities were attributed to distracted driving, with mobile phone use being a common distraction. The mere act of texting increases the likelihood of a crash by up to 23 times (NHTSA, 2020).

Both driving under the influence and distracted driving highlight the need for stringent enforcement of traffic laws and increased public awareness. Preventive measures and stricter regulations, such as bans on mobile phone use while driving, are crucial in reducing these preventable accidents.

Conclusion:

MVAs caused by alcohol and mobile phone use represent a significant portion of traffic-related fatalities. Addressing these issues through comprehensive legislation, technology solutions, and public education campaigns is essential for enhancing road safety and reducing preventable deaths.

11.    Microplastics, defined as small plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in size, arise from the breakdown of larger plastic products and microbeads in personal care products. These particles are not only physically durable, enabling them to persist in the environment, but they also accumulate in waterways, wildlife, and human bodies, presenting emerging health risks.

Sources and Pathways: Microplastics emanate from diverse sources including cosmetics, synthetic textiles, and the degradation of plastic waste. Humans encounter these particles through ingestion of contaminated seafood and salt, inhalation of dust, and direct skin contact. Alarmingly, research has identified microplastics in critical organs and fluids such as the liver, placenta, blood, and breast milk, highlighting their pervasive presence (Leslie et al., 2022).

Health Implications: The most minute microplastics, often classified as nanoplastics, can traverse cellular boundaries and accumulate in various organs, including the brain. They are implicated in oxidative stress, inflammation, and DNA damage—conditions linked to chronic diseases like cancer and cardiovascular disorders. There is also evidence suggesting that microplastics could impair fertility, diminish sperm quality, and disrupt hormonal functions (Amato-Lourenço et al., 2021).

Expert Insight: Dr. Maria Neira of the World Health Organization underscores the urgency of further research, noting the critical need to understand the full implications of microplastics on public health.

Risks from Associated Chemicals: Compounding their danger, microplastics can absorb and transport harmful chemicals such as bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, known for their endocrine-disrupting effects. This dual threat poses significant risks by potentially facilitating the entry of toxic substances into the body (Smith et al., 2021).

Global Health Impact and Future Directions: Despite the growing recognition of their presence, the global health impacts of microplastics remain largely uncharted. This gap underscores the necessity for extensive research to determine their role in human diseases and to inform effective public health strategies.

Mitigation and Personal Actions: Individuals can mitigate exposure to microplastics by choosing products devoid of these particles, utilizing air and water filters that capture synthetic materials, and supporting efforts to curb plastic pollution (Thompson et al., 2022).

Conclusion: As we continue to unravel the complexities of microplastics, it is evident that they pose a significant public health challenge. Proactive steps to reduce exposure and detailed research into their health impacts are critical. By the time decisive action is widespread, it may be too late for many. Therefore, my advice is clear: keep them out of your kitchen and environment.  

12.       Forever Chemicals

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as "forever chemicals," encompass a variety of man-made chemicals including PFOA, PFOS, GenX, among others. Unlike microplastics, which are tangible plastic particles persisting physically in the environment, PFAS are chemical compounds that do not naturally degrade in the environment or the human body, thus earning their moniker. Both substances present significant environmental and health risks, but PFAS are particularly concerning due to their direct chemical toxicity to humans and animals.

Health Impacts of Forever Chemicals: PFAS accumulate in the human body and have been linked to numerous health issues. Research has associated PFAS exposure with a variety of serious conditions, including decreased vaccine efficacy, testicular and kidney cancers, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, high cholesterol, and hypertension during pregnancy (The Public Interest Network, 2023). These chemicals are pervasive, found in everyday items such as non-stick cookware, water-repellent sports gear, stain-resistant carpets, and firefighting foams.

Regulatory Actions and the Need for More Research: Measures to mitigate the risks posed by PFAS are underway, focusing on regulating their use, curtailing their environmental release, and expanding health-related research. Notably, agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) have initiated studies to deepen our understanding of PFAS exposure and its health impacts (UC Irvine Public Health, 2023).

Ongoing research is crucial to comprehensively ascertain the long-term effects of PFAS exposure and to devise effective prevention and remediation strategies. The intricate nature of PFAS contamination and their enduring presence in the environment highlight the urgency for stringent regulatory measures. These regulations should treat all PFAS compounds as a cohesive group to prevent the substitution of one harmful chemical with another that is equally or more dangerous.

Summary and Conclusion

In this chapter, we've explored a variety of harmful substances and practices that pose significant risks to health and longevity. The journey through the risks associated with smoking, vaping, refined sugars, prescription opioids, illicit drugs, gun violence, alcohol, salt intake, microplastics, and forever chemicals highlights a common theme: prevention is key to maintaining health and extending life.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Smoking and Vaping: Both traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes carry grave health risks, notably increasing the incidence of various cancers and cardiovascular diseases. The evidence strongly supports quitting smoking and avoiding the use of e-cigarettes.

  2. Refined Sugars: High intake of refined sugars is linked to obesity, metabolic syndrome, certain cancers, and other chronic conditions. Awareness and moderation can significantly mitigate these risks.

  3. Opioid Crisis: The misuse of prescription opioids and the surge in fentanyl-related deaths underscore the urgent need for tighter controls and public education on the dangers of opioid use.

  4. Illicit Drugs: Non-opioid illicit drugs, including cocaine, methamphetamine, cannabis, and kratom, also contribute to widespread health issues, demanding comprehensive public health interventions.

  5. Gun Violence: As a leading cause of preventable death, addressing gun violence requires a multifaceted approach that includes law enforcement, mental health support, and community-based strategies.

  6. Alcohol Consumption: Despite the perceived benefits, alcohol consumption at any level poses significant health risks, particularly in terms of cancer and cardiovascular diseases.

  7. Salt Intake: Excessive salt consumption is a preventable cause of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Reducing intake to within recommended levels can have profound health benefits.

  8. Microplastics and Forever Chemicals: Emerging contaminants such as microplastics and PFAS present new challenges to public health, with potential impacts that are only beginning to be understood.

Moving Forward: The evidence presented underscores the importance of informed decision-making when it comes to lifestyle choices. As a healthcare provider, my goal is not only to treat but to educate and empower patients to avoid these risks wherever possible. Whether it's choosing not to smoke, moderating sugar and salt intake, or advocating for policy changes to manage and mitigate environmental pollutants like PFAS and microplastics, every small change contributes to a healthier life.

Conclusion: The risks associated with these harmful substances and practices are clear, and the steps to mitigate them, while sometimes challenging, are necessary for those seeking to lead a longer, healthier life. As we move forward, let us choose to be proactive about our health, making choices that extend life rather than shorten it. Let's not wait until it is too late to make changes that could spare us and our loved ones from preventable diseases and premature death. In embracing both knowledge and action, we can all work toward a healthier future.

References:

Amato-Lourenço, L. F., Moreira, T. C. L., de Oliveira Souza, V. C., Barbosa, F., Saiki, M., Saldiva, P. H. N., & Mauad, T. (2021). Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 416, 125912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125912

American Cancer Society. (n.d.). Health risks of smoking tobacco. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/tobacco/health-risks-of-smoking-tobacco.html

American Heart Association. (2023). How much sodium should I eat per day? Retrieved from https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/sodium/how-much-sodium-should-i-eat-per-day

Andréasson, S., Dangardt, F., Naimi, T., Chikritzhs, T., Holder, H., & Stockwell, T. (2023). Trouble Brewing. Vital Strategies, NCD Alliance, IOGT International, & Global Alcohol Policy Alliance. Retrieved from https://movendi.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/IOGT-11400-Rapport_2023_EN-1.pdf

Benowitz, N. L., & Burbank, A. D. (2016). Cardiovascular toxicity of nicotine: Implications for electronic cigarette use. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 26(6), 515-523.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) & Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2023). Multi-Site Health Study on PFAS. Retrieved from CDC/ATSDR

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023, October 23). Lung cancer risk factors. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/cancer/lung_cancer/index.html

Chase, B. (2023, June 12). Is drinking in moderation good for your heart? Harvard Gazette. Retrieved from https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/06/is-drinking-in-moderation-good-for-your-heart/

Dicpinigaitis, P. V., Trachuk, P., Fakier, F., Teka, M., & Suhrland, M. J. (2020). Vaping-associated acute respiratory failure due to acute lipoid pneumonia. Lung, 198(1), 31-33.

 England, L. J., Bunnell, R. E., Pechacek, T. F., Tong, V. T., & McAfee, T. A. (2017). Nicotine and the developing human: A neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(2), 286-293.

Epner, M., Yang, P., Wagner, R. W., & Cohen, L. (2022). Understanding the link between sugar and cancer: An examination of the preclinical and clinical evidence. Cancers, 14(24), 6042. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246042

Francis, H., & Stevenson, R. (2013). The longer-term impacts of Western diet on human cognition and the brain. Appetite, 63, 119-128. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.12.018

Grucza, R. A., Sher, K. J., Kerr, W. C., Krauss, M. J., Lui, C. K., McDowell, Y. E., ... & Bierut, L. J. (2018). No level of alcohol consumption improves health. The Lancet, 392(10152), 987-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31571-X

Henry, T. S., Kligerman, S. J., Raptis, C. A., Mann, H., Sechrist, J. W., & Kanne, J. P. (2020). Imaging findings of vaping-associated lung injury. American Journal of Roentgenology, 214(3), 498-505.

Hutchinson, N. (2024, November 25). Horror X-ray shows mum’s lungs after vaping left her scarred, battling pneumonia and unable to walk without gasping. The Sun. Retrieved from https://www.thesun.co.uk/health/31915989/mums-lungs-vaping-scarred-pneumonia-gasping/

Leslie, H. A., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Brandsma, S. H. (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International, 163, 107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199

McConnell, R., Barrington-Trimis, J. L., Wang, K., Urman, R., Hong, H., Unger, J., ... & Berhane, K. (2017). Electronic-cigarette use and respiratory symptoms in adolescents. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 195(8), 1043-1049.

Moynihan, P., & Kelly, S. (2014). Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: Systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. Journal of Dental Research, 93(1), 8-18. doi:10.1177/0022034513508954

National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). Harms of cigarette smoking and health benefits of quitting. Retrieved from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/tobacco/cessation-fact-sheet

Post, S., Spiller, H. A., Chounthirath, T., & Smith, G. A. (2018). Kratom exposures reported to United States poison control centers: 2011-2017. Clinical Toxicology, 57(10), 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2018.1554863

Public Interest Network. (2023). The Threat of “Forever Chemicals”. Retrieved from PublicInterestNetwork.org

Rippe, J. M., & Angelopoulos, T. J. (2016). Relationship between added sugars consumption and chronic disease risk factors: Current understanding. Nutrients, 8(11), 697. doi:10.3390/nu8110697

Roerecke, M., & Rehm, J. (2014). The relationship between different levels of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: An update. Addiction, 109(6), 904-916. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12512

Schmidt, A., et al. (2018). Effects of sugars on intestinal flora and gut-related health conditions. MDPI. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/7/888

Smith, M., Love, D. C., Rochman, C. M., & Neff, R. A. (2021). Microplastics in seafood and the implications for human health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 8(3), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-021-00314-w

Soneji, S., Barrington-Trimis, J. L., Wills, T. A., Leventhal, A. M., Unger, J. B., Gibson, L. A., ... & Sargent, J. D. (2017). Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(8), 788-797.

Stanhope, K. L. (2016). Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 53(1), 52-67. doi:10.1080/10408363.2015.1084990

Susan G. Komen®. (2023, December 22). Breast cancer risk factors: Smoking. Retrieved from https://www.komen.org/breast-cancer/risk-factor/smoking/

Swartz, T. (2024, September 16). I loved vaping — until my lungs collapsed and black goo poured out of me. New York Post. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2024/09/16/health/vaping-addict-finally-quit-when-lungs-collapsed-black-goo-came-out/

Swartz, T. (2024, October 11). I'm a doctor — here are 4 things I would never do because they're bad for your body. New York Post. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2024/10/11/health/doctor-avoids-vaping-pulling-all-nighters-inactivity-junk-food/

Thompson, R. C., Swan, S. H., Moore, C. J., & vom Saal, F. S. (2022). Plastics, the environment and human health: Current consensus and future trends. Biological Reviews, 97(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12693

University of California, Irvine, Program in Public Health. (2023, April 26). Bridging the gap: The health effects of forever chemicals in our drinking water. Retrieved from https://publichealth.uci.edu/2023/04/26/bridging-the-gap-the-health-effects-of-forever-chemicals-in-our-drinking-water/

Viswam, D., Trotter, S., Burge, P. S., & Walters, G. I. (2018). Respiratory failure caused by lipoid pneumonia from vaping e-cigarettes. BMJ Case Reports, 2018, bcr-2018-224350.

Williams, M., Villarreal, A., Bozhilov, K., Lin, S., & Talbot, P. (2013). Metal and silicate particles including nanoparticles are present in electronic cigarette cartomizer fluid and aerosol. PLoS One, 8(3), e57987.